US APAC EUROPE CANADA LATAM
Aerospace and Defense Review

I'm a solo founder with AI agents instead of employees. My 'council' of AI agents saves me 20 hours a week.

• Aaron Sneed created "The Council," a group of 15 custom GPTs that help him run his business.

• The council includes a chief of staff AI agent, a legal AI agent, an HR AI agent, and more.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

• This article is part of "The AI-Powered Solopreneur," a series exploring how solo business owners use AI to drive growth.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Aaron Sneed, a 40-year-old defense-tech solo founder based in Florida. The following has been edited for length and clarity.

When I started my business, as a solopreneur, I realized I didn't have the money to pay lawyers, HR reps, and a bunch of other companies. So, using AI, I created what I call 'The Council.'

The council, which is compiled of all AI agents, helps me save around 20 hours a week, and that's a very conservative estimate. Every kind of general corporate chair, HR, legal, and finance AI agent has a seat on the council.

Here's how I use around 15 custom agents, including a chief of staff agent, to manage my workload.

Business Insider wants to talk to founders of AI-powered companies with fewer than 10 workers, and employees working alongside AI agents and bots, to understand what the "Tiny Teams" era really feels like — the wins, the fears, and the human skills that stand out. Share your story by filling out this quick form.

I've been using automated tools for at least a decade

I've worked on autonomous platforms that make decisions independently for at least 10 years. That made me latch onto commercial large language models and AI tools very quickly when they came out.

I primarily use Nvidia's platform as my underlying hardware for technical prototyping and experimentation. I use their GPUs, and they provide free access to their AI software since I purchased their hardware. Additionally, my council is built on OpenAI's ChatGPT business platform using custom GPTs and projects.

Altogether, my AI council consists of the following:

• chief of staff agent

• HR agent

• finance agent

• accounting agent

• legal, comms, and PR agents

• security and compliance agent

• engineering agent

• quality agent

• supply chain agent

• training agent

• manufacturing agent

• business systems agent

• facilities agent

• field operations agent

• IT and data agent

Each agent has a different level of authority

My chief of staff agent is important because it's the voice that sets priority based on parameters like risks, issues, and opportunities.

I told my chief of staff which models have priority when making decisions. For example, anything legal, compliance, or security-related will be given a higher priority. So, I tell the chief of staff to listen to these models over everyone else.

I trained my AI agents to push back and not just say 'yes'

I don't want a bunch of yes agents. I trained them purposefully to give me pushback because I've learned that they naturally want to agree with me. I want them to test my theories to help me with what I'm trying to accomplish.

I have a roundtable set up with all my AI agents, where I can put something like a request-for-proposal document in the chat, and all the agents will weigh in at the same time. I use this roundtable as a level of prevention for hallucinations and knowledge gaps.

The training never really stops, because if I don't continuously train the models, I won't get the outputs I want or need. It takes me about two weeks to train my agents to the level of experience they need to be at for me to feel confident in them. Early on, it took me longer to produce a deliverable than if I'd just done it myself because I hadn't focused properly on training.

I've become a better prompter through training my AI agents

The models have gotten better, and my prompting has, too. I have a better understanding of what information should be in an agent, like having a governance structure for priorities. I have a set of files that put those requirements in place to mitigate the risk of hallucination and false or bad information.

All of the AI companies have different prompt engineering guides. I recommend taking the time to look at them because there's a lot of user error that causes things to slow down when working with AI.

It takes time to get the agents to a good place. A lot of companies are going to try to jump into using AI too quickly for too much without understanding how to use it properly, and these companies could hurt themselves in the long run.

AI replaced roles — but it hasn't replaced human judgment

I'm ill-equipped to handle a lot of these roles and responsibilities, but I'm also forced to do it because I'm bootstrapped.

With my legal agent in particular, I've learned the bounds of putting AI tools into real-world practice. I have a lawyer, and I use my legal agent to try to do some upfront work before handing documents off to my lawyer for a patent or dispute case, or anything like that.

When I was training my model to help me use facts and data to plot a case, I had a lot of information laid out, and I thought what my legal agent created sounded good to me as a non-lawyer. Then I presented all that information to my lawyer, and he said that it was technically and factually correct, but we don't want to express that information because it shows our cards going in.

His legal skillset helped me realize that, even though I thought my agent was correct and ideal to use, it still won't replace a lawyer with that human context, experience, and skills.

Ideally, I would have an HR person, a legal person, and so on, and each would have their own chief of staff AI agent who would help them out. That's what I think the future will look like.

More in News

Modern defence programs no longer evaluate fuzing systems as passive triggering mechanisms. They are expected to function as embedded decision layers within complex munitions, influencing accuracy, safety and mission adaptability under highly variable conditions. The shift toward precision-led operations has exposed a set of pressures that separate capable manufacturers from those that cannot sustain program-level demands. At the centre of this shift is the expectation that fuzing must support configurable mission behaviour without compromising safety assurance. Programmable architectures are becoming more and more associated with air-delivered munitions, guided artillery and missile systems, where engagement results are determined by in-flight or pre-launch configurability. This necessitates the use of modular design techniques that enable quick adaptation across various munition types while allowing the reuse of proven components. Here, systems that depend on disjointed development chains suffer because integration gaps cause delays and inconsistencies that compromise dependability. Reliability itself has become a more complex benchmark. Achieving high functional success rates in controlled situations is no longer enough; systems now need to show consistent performance in a variety of operating contexts, electronic interference and stressful environments. Manufacturers with full-cycle validation capabilities, from early-stage development to production-level verification, are emphasised. One of the key indicators of long-term system integrity is now continuous in-process testing. Safety is still unavoidable, although its interpretation has changed. Modern safety frameworks need to consider handling, transport, and failure scenarios in live situations in addition to preventing premature detonation. Multi-layered safety and arming mechanisms, combined with redundancy strategies such as backup detonation modes and controlled self-neutralisation, now play a critical role in reducing unintended effects. Integrating these mechanisms without compromising performance is a vital factor in supplier selection. Supplier ecosystem fragmentation is another source of pressure. Defence programs frequently involve several vendors in the fields of electronics, mechanics, and energetic materials, which can lead to coordination issues that impact system coherence and timeliness. A more straightforward route to program execution is provided by manufacturers who internalize these competencies while retaining flexibility for cooperative integration. This balance between vertical capability and partnership readiness has become essential in large-scale procurement decisions. Against this backdrop, Junghans Defence presents a model that aligns closely with these emerging expectations. Its approach is built on complete in-house coverage of fuzing technologies, spanning mechanical, electromechanical and fully electronic systems, supported by integrated capabilities in power sources and pyrotechnics. This breadth maintains consistency in design and validation processes while configuring solutions across a range of ammunition types. And with the modular architecture, proven components are rapidly reassembled into new configurations to support changing mission requirements without requiring lengthy development cycles. While unified integration permits end-to-end control over safety, testing, and production, the structure of specialized competence centers guarantees depth within each technical domain. This results in high reliability supported by continuous in-process verification and comprehensive environmental and functional testing conducted entirely in-house. The company’s work in programmable fuzing, including applications in guided artillery and emerging munition types, reflects a focus on adaptability and precision. At the same time, layered safety strategies incorporating redundant functions and self-destruct mechanisms demonstrate a commitment to controlled outcomes even in failure scenarios. Its independence within the defence ecosystem further positions it as a neutral partner capable of supporting diverse program requirements without alignment constraints. For defence executives prioritising precision, safety assurance and integration efficiency, Junghans Defence stands as a credible benchmark for fuzing system manufacture in Europe. ...Read more
An aircraft can be technically serviceable yet commercially compromised by a weak record trail. For European owners and operators, gaps between the physical aircraft and its technical history can surface during registration or sale, turning what appeared to be a routine transaction into rework or pricing pressure. Aircraft management, therefore, has to do more than watch maintenance dates. It must establish whether the records can withstand scrutiny and whether the aircraft’s configuration is supported by evidence that regulators and future buyers can accept. The financial exposure often appears late, when a buyer has less leverage to correct the record or renegotiate the transaction. Record integrity is the first dividing line. A management provider should be able to reconstruct maintenance history far enough to expose missing proof or incomplete task closeouts. Modifications deserve separate scrutiny when their approval basis may not align with the intended registration. The age of the aircraft matters because ownership changes multiply the number of handoffs that records have passed through. A superficial document check can miss discrepancies that only become visible when technical files are compared with the aircraft itself. Buyers should look for a method that links each recorded requirement to supporting evidence rather than treating archived documentation as inherently reliable. A clean status report is useful only when the evidence beneath it can be followed back to the work performed. Forward visibility matters just as much after entry into service. Daily aircraft management depends on accurate capture of flight hours and flight cycles, followed by disciplined control of maintenance status and life-limited components. Airworthiness directives and service bulletins also need continuous review against the aircraft’s current status. The practical issue is not whether software is present. Most systems can store due dates. The distinction lies in whether the provider keeps the data current enough to reveal emerging exposure before it reaches a maintenance event or interrupts planned use. “CAMO Aviation uses an aircraft recovery process that covers records and physical configuration, then cross-checks the resulting status against authority requirements.” Regulatory judgment becomes especially important when an aircraft crosses jurisdictions. An approval accepted by one authority may not automatically satisfy European requirements, leaving an owner with a configuration that is difficult to validate after purchase. The provider must know when a record discrepancy is administrative and when it affects the acceptance of the aircraft itself. That judgment should shape the scope of the engagement. A recent aircraft with a clean ownership history does not demand the same depth of recovery as an older aircraft that has moved through several operators. Digital tracking can organise status information, but interpretation still depends on familiarity with regulator expectations and recurring documentation failures. Decision-makers should test whether technical decisions receive experienced human review rather than being delegated to software. CAMO Aviation is a premier choice for buyers who place record traceability and European airworthiness control at the centre of aircraft management. CAMO Aviation uses an aircraft recovery process that covers records and physical configuration, then cross-checks the resulting status against authority requirements. Its relevant scope covers aircraft management and airworthiness review. Phase-in and phase-out support extends that scrutiny into aircraft entry or exit. Its team brings more than two decades of aircraft management and airworthiness experience, including former civil aviation inspection work. Experienced personnel also track daily utilisation and technical status, reinforcing a management model built around documented conformity rather than schedule monitoring alone. ...Read more
Career training in flight attendant provides aspiring cabin crew with knowledge, skills, communication and professional confidence for careers in aviation. The role of cabin crew is to ensure the safety of passengers, follow emergency procedures, be alert to security, have a knowledge of first aid, be able to provide service, communicate effectively and maintain a professional demeanor during flight. Training providers help candidates to learn and develop by offering structured programs comprising classroom learning, exercises, simulated scenarios, customer service training and career preparation. Elevating Safety through Innovative Flight Attendant Training A simulation gives a more realistic means of training for an environment that may not be easily simulated in a traditional classroom. Aircraft cabins, emergencies, passenger interaction, turbulence, and other conditions that demand a calm and orderly response can be simulated in the training environment. Virtual reality could also increase the scale of simulation training to enable users to simulate emergencies and cabin-management scenarios in a digital environment. Practicing scenarios repeatedly can help candidates get used to the procedures before putting them into practice. Adaptive learning systems can suggest lessons, assessments, or exercises to candidates that are based on the performance of each individual candidate instead of exactly the same path for every candidate. Using digital assessment tools can support the assessment of knowledge, communication skills, decision-making and procedural understanding. Digital study materials can aid revision prior to exams, interviews, practical assessments and airline recruitment. Student records and course materials, attendance, assessments, certifications, and instructor feedback can be integrated into training management platforms. Flight attendants should have the ability to physically carry out safety measures, effectively communicate during crises, help passengers and be efficient as a cabin crew team. While airlines focus on customer service and safety, career training providers are creating courses that teach technical aviation skills along with soft skills and service. The advent of technology and simulation has revolutionized flight attendant training. With the new technology and simulation, flight attendant training has undergone a revolution. Navigating the Future of Flight Attendants Candidates should be familiar with the procedures to follow in an emergency, aircraft safety equipment, evacuation principles, fire response, first aid and how to manage passengers in an emergency. Cabin crew members deal with passengers from diverse backgrounds and are expected to give clear instructions, professionally and calmly. Emphasis on training programs includes verbal communication, active listening, conflict management, and cultural awareness. Training enables candidates to know how to deal with requests, complaints and how to ensure a positive passenger experience while at the same time not putting safety obligations at risk. Training programs build collaboration skills, role awareness, leadership, and decision-making skills that enable individuals to work effectively in dynamic environments. The ability to speak multiple languages may be beneficial for candidates' communication with a wider range of passengers. Aviation customer service training may include professional communication, personal presentation, grooming, etiquette and business etiquette, and explain the expectations of working with customers in aviation. Guidance on application preparation, resume development, group exercise, communication assessment, behavioral interviews and presentation skills is offered to candidates. Situational awareness and mental resilience are also increasingly being considered. Flight attendants might face medical emergencies, challenging passengers, delays, emergencies, and beyond. Training can prepare the candidates to make calm decisions and have professional reactions to stressful situations. Blended online learning, weekend programs, intensive courses and specialized workshops now supplement the traditional classroom programs. The flexibility will enable candidates of all educational and professional streams to take up aviation career options. Aviating with Digital Training for Flight Attendants The blend of digital learning and hands-on experience will become more prevalent in flight attendant training. Training providers will utilize technology to allow for greater flexibility in learning journeys and ensure that the learner experiences hands-on preparation for a safety-focused career. AI can be used to identify student gaps in knowledge, improve communication practice, and practical competence remains the responsibility of the instructor, who will determine whether the student is ready for the job. Virtual reality and high-end simulation will further open up the training possibilities for scenario-based training. Students might be able to repeatedly practice emergency responses, passenger interactions, service situations and cabin procedures without entering physical training environments. Performance data can be useful to training providers when they are looking for common issues and making changes to their courses. Theoretical lessons can be conducted online and with physical training sessions dedicated to emergency procedures, equipment handling, teamwork and realistic cabin simulations. Flight attendant career training should be a combination of technology and human development. Flight attendant career training solutions for aspiring cabin crew members involve a set of modules that cover safety education, flight preparation, customer service, and professional skills to give the trainee a structured path to a career in aviation. Incorporating immersive learning, flexible digital education, practical simulation, and career preparation, training programs will see continuous development, enabling candidates to better equip themselves for the demands of modern cabin crew roles. ...Read more
Modern organizations that function in the domains of defense, public safety, critical infrastructure, and national security are turning towards high-tech solutions for the conversion of operational data into intelligence. AI-powered tactical exploitation solutions have become a significant asset that allows the processing of massive amounts of structured and unstructured data efficiently and effectively. Using AI, machine learning, data integration, and analytics tools, these solutions improve situational awareness and facilitate planning. Organizations understand that timely intelligence plays an important role in the process of achieving better coordination and effective use of resources in response to changing demands. With the emergence of digital transformation within mission-critical environments, AI-powered tactical exploitation platforms open up new possibilities for enhancing operational efficiency and fostering collaboration. Artificial Intelligence Enhancing Data Analysis Capabilities The use of artificial intelligence has greatly enhanced the capacity of organizations to undertake analysis of huge amounts of data created through various operational sources. The exploitation platforms that utilize artificial intelligence have been able to gather information from sources such as sensors, images, texts, communication networks, geospatial data, and operations reports in a single environment where thorough analysis is undertaken. Machine learning systems constantly enhance their performance through identifying repeating data patterns and improving predictive power as they gain experience. Classification, object detection, natural language processing, and anomaly detection shorten the time needed for analyzing information and ensure consistent results of the analysis process. This allows organizations to focus on significant data and make decisions faster without loss in quality. The use of visualization techniques makes analysis even more effective as it helps present complicated information in the form of dashboards, maps, and reporting tools. This will provide decision makers with better insights into the operational situation as well as the necessary intelligence presented in forms that make it easier to understand quickly. It will also help in collaborating with different departments. Operational Efficiency through Integrated Intelligence Platforms Tactical integration of these tools will result in increased efficiency due to the combination of many processes within one digital space. Instead of dealing with separate information systems, companies will be able to incorporate all of their tasks, including collecting, processing, analyzing, reporting, and managing information. Automation is an important factor in improving operational efficiency because it can do routine analytic work that was once time-consuming to do manually. Data collection, indexing, correlation, and analysis through automation enable analysts to concentrate on more productive functions like planning. Enhanced efficiency in the workflow process means that responses will be faster and that labor will be used more effectively. Scalable system architecture allows companies to change their analytical skills according to new needs. With every new source of information, a company can easily expand its platform without affecting its existing systems. This allows companies to perform either centralized or decentralized tasks while keeping high analytical standards. Data governance is still a critical part of platform implementation. Adequate access control, auditing, encryption technology, and management of information protect sensitive business data during the entire process of analysis. Effective governance mechanisms not only facilitate compliance with regulations but also establish responsibility and information integrity within the organization. Building Long-Term Organizational Value through Innovation The ongoing development of AI continues to open up new ways in which companies can enhance their intelligence functions, along with enhancing their future business performance. Through predictive analysis, companies are able to analyze past data along with current operational data, which helps with planning and optimal resource management. This helps in achieving operational readiness along with lowering uncertainties within the decision-making process. Workforce development is still equally critical as intelligent technologies continue to evolve and grow more complex. Analysts, technical experts, and operators need ongoing training to fully exploit the potential of these intelligent platforms while retaining analytical acumen. Continued professional development is essential to the integration of technological and human skills for optimal operations. Interoperability is another important aspect in the design of future platforms. Companies need systems that are able to integrate into enterprise systems, communication frameworks, geospatial platforms, and analytics environments. Open architecture provides for easy information sharing and, at the same time, allows companies to preserve their previous technology investments. Strategic investment in AI-enabled tactical exploitation systems is more than just buying new technologies; it entails governance, capability building, infrastructure upgrades, and performance optimization. Organizational alignment of all these components within a digital transformation strategy helps build resilience and enhances return on investment in the process. Performance evaluation of analysis is an ongoing effort aimed at optimizing and ensuring the effectiveness of new technologies. Given how mission environments are becoming more data-intensive, it is clear that AI-based tactical exploitation platforms will continue to be vital to entities that wish to gain fast analysis, good collaboration, and sound decision-making. Entities that will invest in intelligent analytics, data management, workforce knowledge, and digital technology will be better equipped to handle future challenges. With the proper incorporation of artificial intelligence with tried and tested analysis practices, entities will be able to increase operational effectiveness, information management, collaborative decision making, responsible innovation, and deliver sustained value while being agile, resilient, and perform sustainably. ...Read more