US APAC EUROPE CANADA LATAM
Aerospace and Defense Review

I'm a solo founder with AI agents instead of employees. My 'council' of AI agents saves me 20 hours a week.

• Aaron Sneed created "The Council," a group of 15 custom GPTs that help him run his business.

• The council includes a chief of staff AI agent, a legal AI agent, an HR AI agent, and more.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

• This article is part of "The AI-Powered Solopreneur," a series exploring how solo business owners use AI to drive growth.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Aaron Sneed, a 40-year-old defense-tech solo founder based in Florida. The following has been edited for length and clarity.

When I started my business, as a solopreneur, I realized I didn't have the money to pay lawyers, HR reps, and a bunch of other companies. So, using AI, I created what I call 'The Council.'

The council, which is compiled of all AI agents, helps me save around 20 hours a week, and that's a very conservative estimate. Every kind of general corporate chair, HR, legal, and finance AI agent has a seat on the council.

Here's how I use around 15 custom agents, including a chief of staff agent, to manage my workload.

Business Insider wants to talk to founders of AI-powered companies with fewer than 10 workers, and employees working alongside AI agents and bots, to understand what the "Tiny Teams" era really feels like — the wins, the fears, and the human skills that stand out. Share your story by filling out this quick form.

I've been using automated tools for at least a decade

I've worked on autonomous platforms that make decisions independently for at least 10 years. That made me latch onto commercial large language models and AI tools very quickly when they came out.

I primarily use Nvidia's platform as my underlying hardware for technical prototyping and experimentation. I use their GPUs, and they provide free access to their AI software since I purchased their hardware. Additionally, my council is built on OpenAI's ChatGPT business platform using custom GPTs and projects.

Altogether, my AI council consists of the following:

• chief of staff agent

• HR agent

• finance agent

• accounting agent

• legal, comms, and PR agents

• security and compliance agent

• engineering agent

• quality agent

• supply chain agent

• training agent

• manufacturing agent

• business systems agent

• facilities agent

• field operations agent

• IT and data agent

Each agent has a different level of authority

My chief of staff agent is important because it's the voice that sets priority based on parameters like risks, issues, and opportunities.

I told my chief of staff which models have priority when making decisions. For example, anything legal, compliance, or security-related will be given a higher priority. So, I tell the chief of staff to listen to these models over everyone else.

I trained my AI agents to push back and not just say 'yes'

I don't want a bunch of yes agents. I trained them purposefully to give me pushback because I've learned that they naturally want to agree with me. I want them to test my theories to help me with what I'm trying to accomplish.

I have a roundtable set up with all my AI agents, where I can put something like a request-for-proposal document in the chat, and all the agents will weigh in at the same time. I use this roundtable as a level of prevention for hallucinations and knowledge gaps.

The training never really stops, because if I don't continuously train the models, I won't get the outputs I want or need. It takes me about two weeks to train my agents to the level of experience they need to be at for me to feel confident in them. Early on, it took me longer to produce a deliverable than if I'd just done it myself because I hadn't focused properly on training.

I've become a better prompter through training my AI agents

The models have gotten better, and my prompting has, too. I have a better understanding of what information should be in an agent, like having a governance structure for priorities. I have a set of files that put those requirements in place to mitigate the risk of hallucination and false or bad information.

All of the AI companies have different prompt engineering guides. I recommend taking the time to look at them because there's a lot of user error that causes things to slow down when working with AI.

It takes time to get the agents to a good place. A lot of companies are going to try to jump into using AI too quickly for too much without understanding how to use it properly, and these companies could hurt themselves in the long run.

AI replaced roles — but it hasn't replaced human judgment

I'm ill-equipped to handle a lot of these roles and responsibilities, but I'm also forced to do it because I'm bootstrapped.

With my legal agent in particular, I've learned the bounds of putting AI tools into real-world practice. I have a lawyer, and I use my legal agent to try to do some upfront work before handing documents off to my lawyer for a patent or dispute case, or anything like that.

When I was training my model to help me use facts and data to plot a case, I had a lot of information laid out, and I thought what my legal agent created sounded good to me as a non-lawyer. Then I presented all that information to my lawyer, and he said that it was technically and factually correct, but we don't want to express that information because it shows our cards going in.

His legal skillset helped me realize that, even though I thought my agent was correct and ideal to use, it still won't replace a lawyer with that human context, experience, and skills.

Ideally, I would have an HR person, a legal person, and so on, and each would have their own chief of staff AI agent who would help them out. That's what I think the future will look like.

More in News

Drone exploitation has moved from a specialist intelligence function toward the point of contact. Small unmanned systems now appear across military missions, yet useful data can remain trapped in devices without technical specialists or rear-echelon analysts. That delay can erase the value of information about launch locations, flight trajectory, imagery and pilot signatures. Procurement decisions must assess whether a platform can extract and organize relevant intelligence before the tactical window closes. Speed alone is a poor buying test. A system may process technical data and still burden the operator with raw files or unfamiliar forensic steps. Teams working under heat, fatigue, threat and time pressure need a limited set of answers presented clearly enough to guide immediate judgment. Interfaces should surface origin points, flight paths, stored media and prior activity without concealing the evidence used to reach those findings. Disconnected use deserves equal weight. Tactical units cannot assume stable internet access or reliable cloud reach-back. AI models that depend on remote processing may perform well in demonstrations but become unreliable without supported networks. Local analysis on a handheld device protects mission tempo and reduces dependence on external infrastructure. Human control also needs to remain visible. AI should shorten familiar analytical work and distinguish generated insights from source data while leaving targeting decisions with trained personnel. “DroneTrace integrates with the Tactical Awareness Kit and Anduril’s Lattice platform, allowing exploitation data to enter existing command, targeting and intelligence workflows.” Integration often decides whether exploitation data becomes actionable or merely archived. Intelligence from a recovered drone gains value when it can be pushed into systems used for mapping, command-and-control activity, targeting support and adjacent-unit coordination. Manual transfer creates delay and increases the chances of findings remaining isolated from the people who need them. Buyers should examine whether a platform shares data through established defense networks and preserves context during transfer while supporting immediate distribution and deeper analysis. Procurement teams must test how a platform handles damaged devices, unfamiliar drone models and incomplete records. Recovery conditions are rarely controlled, and adversaries can modify hardware or software without notice. Broad device coverage matters only when extraction remains repeatable, evidence handling stays clear, and updates can reach fielded systems without disrupting mission procedures. Mission differences complicate platform selection. Special operations units may prioritize rapid extraction that feeds an active targeting cycle, while federal law enforcement teams require forensic collection that can withstand evidentiary review. A platform must support both forms without forcing one group into another’s workflow. It should also adapt as unmanned threats extend beyond aerial drones into ground systems, maritime platforms, humanoid robots and other autonomous devices. Purchasing decisions made around a single device type can create another replacement cycle as the threat mix changes. DroneTrace addresses these pressures through an AI-driven tactical exploitation platform built for recovered unmanned systems. Its handheld device processes drone data locally, presents mission-relevant findings through a map-based interface and preserves the underlying forensic record for independent review. AI supports analysis without automating sensitive decisions. It integrates with the Tactical Awareness Kit and Anduril’s Lattice platform, allowing exploitation data to enter existing command, targeting and intelligence workflows. The design supports rapid military use alongside forensically sound law enforcement collection, giving defense buyers a practical option when disconnected access must coexist with speed, evidentiary integrity and human judgment. ...Read more
A model jet purchase can stall when the engine, fuel path, airframe and accessories arrive from separate sources and leave the buyer to solve fit and support issues on personal time. The hobby may look discretionary, yet serious RC turbine flying depends on parts that must work together under tight tolerances. For model-aviation enthusiasts, procurement is less about finding another catalog than reducing the number of gaps between selection and flight. Product range matters because fragmentation creates hidden costs. A turbine engine is only one part of the purchase. Fuel delivery, air trap tanks, tank hardware, batteries, electronics and airframes shape whether the installation becomes manageable or turns into repeated troubleshooting. Buyers should favor suppliers that understand the aircraft as a working assembly rather than a shelf of unrelated parts. Breadth alone is not enough. The practical test is whether the product mix shortens decision time while reducing compatibility uncertainty. Time pressure has also changed the model aircraft market. Fewer buyers can spend months building from raw components, and many still want the discipline of a serious turbine aircraft rather than a toy-grade shortcut. Partially assembled PNP and ARF-style aircraft address that shift only when the remaining work is well documented and backed by knowledgeable advice. Preassembly is not merely convenience. It is a way to protect buyer time without removing the work required to complete the aircraft. Quality control carries a different meaning in turbine hobby equipment than it does in ordinary leisure products. Small defects can become expensive fast, especially in fuel systems and fittings. Consistent manufacturing practices and feedback-driven refinement give buyers more confidence before a model reaches the runway. The same logic applies to repair support. Slow answers can ground aircraft for weeks, while a supplier that can diagnose issues quickly keeps equipment in use and reduces frustration after the sale. The UAV crossover adds another pressure point. Fuel system components, once judged mainly by hobby standards, are now being reviewed by buyers with more formal expectations around repeatability and service response. Stock availability matters, especially when a grounded aircraft waits on a modest fitting. Such demand does not make hobby equipment industrial by default, but it raises the bar for documentation, supply continuity, repair pathways and workmanship. A supplier serving both experienced hobbyists and UAV builders needs the product depth to handle technical questions without turning every purchase into a custom research project. KingTech Turbine Luxembourg fits that buying logic as a single-source option for RC turbine engines and aviation hobby equipment. It offers KingTech turbines from Taiwan, turboprops, PNP model aircraft, UAT fuel systems, soft tanks, clunks, tank fittings and related accessories. The company also manufactures and assembles many fuel-system products in Luxembourg, supports European and UK customers and places quick repair service alongside product advice. For buyers who want one source for turbine propulsion and practical post-sale help around fuel-path hardware, it offers a streamlined route from product selection to flight readiness. ...Read more
Aerospace composite manufacturing solutions in Canada are advancing rapidly as the aviation and defense industries prioritize lightweight engineering, fuel efficiency, sustainability, and high-performance materials. Composite materials are increasingly replacing traditional metals in aircraft structures because they offer superior strength-to-weight advantages, corrosion resistance, and greater design flexibility. As aerospace technologies continue to evolve, Canadian manufacturers are investing in smarter and more efficient composite production systems to meet modern industry demands. Canada’s aerospace sector is strengthening its capabilities through advanced manufacturing innovation, automation, and material engineering. Composite manufacturing solutions are supporting the development of next-generation commercial aircraft, defense systems, drones, and advanced mobility platforms while improving operational performance and production efficiency. Connected production systems, predictive maintenance technologies, and integrated digital workflows are improving operational visibility and manufacturing efficiency across aerospace facilities. What Are the Key Trends in Advanced Materials and Intelligent Manufacturing? Manufacturers are integrating robotic systems, automated cutting technologies, digital inspection tools, and precision manufacturing equipment to improve consistency and reduce production time. These technologies help increase manufacturing accuracy while supporting faster and more scalable production processes. Carbon fiber composites, hybrid materials, and lightweight structural solutions are being widely adopted to improve aircraft performance and reduce overall weight. The materials contribute to improved fuel efficiency, lower emissions, and enhanced durability for aerospace applications. Digital monitoring platforms, AI-driven analytics, and smart quality control systems help manufacturers optimize workflows, reduce material waste, and maintain higher production standards throughout the manufacturing process. Rapid prototyping and digital design integration are further improving aerospace manufacturing capabilities. Advanced simulation technologies and computer-aided manufacturing systems allow companies to accelerate product development and respond more quickly to changing aerospace requirements. How Can Sustainability and Additive Manufacturing Drive Future Innovation in Aerospace? Manufacturers are seeking environmentally responsible production methods that reduce energy consumption, improve material efficiency, and minimize industrial waste. Sustainable manufacturing practices are increasingly influencing both material selection and production processes. Aerospace companies are integrating composite manufacturing with advanced 3D printing technologies to create complex and lightweight components with greater precision. It improves design flexibility while reducing assembly complexity and material usage. The processes help reduce production costs and energy requirements while maintaining the structural performance of aerospace composite components. Research and development collaboration continues to drive innovation across the industry. Aerospace manufacturers, research institutions, and engineering organizations are working together to develop next-generation composite technologies capable of meeting future aviation and defense requirements. ...Read more
Modern military operations across the Asia Pacific (APAC) region often involve cooperation among multiple nations during maritime patrols, disaster relief, border surveillance and humanitarian assistance missions. These operations require rapid coordination among air, naval and ground units that may use different communication platforms and command structures. Interoperable communication systems help ensure that information moves clearly between forces without delays or confusion. When military teams from different countries can exchange voice data and operational updates through connected systems, they improve coordination and reduce the risk of mistakes in high-pressure situations. The region includes vast oceans, remote islands and areas affected by natural disasters, which make reliable communication even more important. During joint missions, military personnel may need to coordinate rescue operations, share intelligence or respond to emergencies in difficult environments. Interoperable systems allow commanders to maintain visibility across different units while helping troops respond quickly to changing conditions. This level of connectivity supports faster decision-making and helps allied forces maintain operational awareness even when missions become complex. Why Does Interoperability Matter in Multinational Missions? Joint military exercises across the region have shown that forces often operate with different technologies, encryption standards and network capabilities. Without compatible communication systems, information can become delayed, fragmented or misunderstood. Interoperability creates a shared operational language that enables forces to communicate through secure and standardized platforms. This improves trust between partner nations and strengthens cooperation during both training exercises and real-world missions. Military alliances and regional security partnerships continue to place a strong emphasis on integrated communication because modern threats move quickly across borders. Cyber threats, maritime disputes and disaster response efforts all require connected operations among multiple agencies and defense organizations. Interoperable systems support this cooperation by enabling secure data sharing among command centers, surveillance assets and frontline personnel. They also help reduce duplication of effort while improving coordination between military and civilian emergency response teams. How Are Modern Technologies Improving Military Communication? Advanced satellite-based communication networks and artificial intelligence-driven systems are helping military organizations improve interoperability over long distances. Secure digital platforms now allow forces to exchange real-time intelligence maps and operational data through unified systems. These technologies help commanders monitor mission progress while improving coordination between naval fleets, aircraft and ground units. The growing use of autonomous systems and unmanned platforms has also increased the need for a compatible communication infrastructure. Drones, surveillance aircraft and remote sensors must transmit accurate information across different military networks without interruption. As defense cooperation expands throughout the APAC region, interoperable communication systems will remain essential to mission success. They strengthen regional security partnerships, improve operational efficiency and support safer coordination during critical military and humanitarian operations. ...Read more